Category Archives: Bill of Rights

Liar, liar

Is it time to start taking government at their word? And by their word, I of course mean the polar opposite of their word. On every story that matters, the truth lies not in what we are told, but in the exact opposite of that. In 1984 Orwell states:

And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed – if all records told the same tale – then the lie passed into history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.” And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory. “Reality control,” they called it: in Newspeak, “doublethink.”

Has the Obama administration been reading too much Orwell? The rewriting of recent events seems to indicate they are. Silencing of Benghazi whistle blowers is the most obvious evidence of the attempt to control the narrative of events, thus writing history not as impartial observers of events, but as author and narrator. “If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.” Words to live by, in this White House.

Jay Carney – Bold Face Lie

We now know nearly everything said in the above clip is a bold face lie based on extensive testimony by the Benghazi whistle blowers.

Whistle Blower Testimony

When the news first broke of AP and later FOX surveillance, Attorney General Eric Holder claimed no involvement. Mere days later it is revealed that he personally approved the FOX News warrant.

And the IRS. Oh, they didn’t do anything wrong, but plead the 5th Amendment. The Bill of Rights, only applicable when it is convenient for the government. Unfortunately for the Obama administration, the web of lies is starting to fall apart here as well. Who knew what, when. Yes, it leads back to the White House. Again.

And that is the ending chapter of all these scandals. It always leads back to the White House, and their attempts to author history. Rather than writing history through bold leadership, they meekly let events unfold around them and rewrite it to suit their political careers. While people died in Benghazi, the White House did nothing but author fictitious story lines about YouTube. While the DOJ spied on American news agencies, Obama’s patsy, Eric Holder, tried to hide their actions. And despite the IRS Commissioner visiting the White House over 100 times, we’re expected to believe that, again, Obama had no knowledge, no involvement, in the harassment of political enemies via the IRS.

This White House may be a big fan of Orwell, but there is one thing Orwell got wrong. The flow of information in the modern age. While the technology enabling Big Brother is more advanced than ever, so is the technology for broadcasting the truth. And there is one other fact.

We’ve read Orwell too. And we know what you’re doing.

Unalienable Rights in Modern America

As I watch and read the news of proposed and even passed gun control legislation, I find myself wondering why some amendments are subject to weakening while others are not. There is a debate raging with reference to the extent gun ownership should be restricted or magazine capacity limited. What would be the reaction if the debate was over an amendment other than the 2nd? What would be the acceptable limitation on free speech? What if Congress decreed that 25% of speech was now illegal? What if 25% of all news articles were simply redacted? Or, the 3rd Amendment only stood for 20 days of the month, but 10 days of the month government agents could enter your house and you must feed them, clothe them and let them have their way with your wife and daughters as pre-Revolutionary English soldiers did?

If infringement of the 1st, 3rd, or any other of the Bill of Rights is unacceptable, why then would infringement of the 2nd be acceptable? When we declared our independence from England, we declared our rights to be unalienable. The 2nd Amendment stands as testament to the people’s right to resist oppression, to resist tyranny, to resist usurpation by government. Rights exist without inscription upon parchment, without the blessing of government, but as an inherent part of all free people. These rights were recorded, not granted, for posterity in that document. To infringe upon such a right is to infringe upon the very definition of freedom.

I’ve heard all manner of interpretations regarding the 2nd Amendment. Even the most elementary evaluation of the Bill of Rights reveals an underlying tenor that rights exist to resist the natural progression of government toward tyranny; rights recorded, not granted, for posterity.

Some may scoff at the idea that tyranny could ever rise in America. In a country founded on the principle of liberty, with the mightiest military the world has ever seen, how could a tyrant gain power here? How does it happen anywhere?

Stalin. Mao. Caesar. Mubarak. Pot. Salazar. Chavez. Hitler. Khamenei. Kim Jong-il. Kim Jong-un.

The “how?” is irrelevant. What is relevant is that it can, and has, happened throughout the course of history – even in our lifetimes. Do I expect to take up arms against my government in my lifetime? Absolutely not. Do I expect my kids to? Absolutely not. But, should the need arise, am I willing *and able* to do so? Yes. We often talk about the 3 branches of government, and how they are supposed to keep each other in check. Rarely do we mention the 4th influence that keeps government, as a whole, in check – the armed populace.

At question today is the right to defend one’s self from harm, be it immediate physical harm or the harm of a remote ruling tyrant – a right which predates the firearm. From the time the first cave man raised his fist or rock in defense of his possessions, he was exercising his natural rights. The 2nd Amendment is simply a representation of an already established right of man. There is no negotiation of natural rights, they are non-negotiable. The negotiation of rights is a tactic used by those who would usurp power over us. Let us not retreat on the 2nd Amendment, lest we find ourselves defending against assailants, or tyranny, with only a rock and our fists.